Internal and external employer branding aren’t two jobs.
Most definitions of employer branding treat it as a one-way signal: a reputation broadcast outward to attract candidates, built from proof gathered inward.
Internal and external employer branding run as two separate jobs, with HR minding the inside and marketing or TA minding the outside.
In The Magnetic Employer Branding Method™, that split doesn’t exist. Internal and external employer branding are one story, built so that what your employees believe about your organisation and what candidates hear about it are structurally impossible to pull apart.
That’s not a nicer way of saying “be consistent.” It’s a different architecture entirely.
What “employer branding” usually means
Ask most people to define employer branding, and you’ll get some version of: your company’s reputation as a place to work, shaped by what candidates and job seekers perceive, with employee experience playing a supporting role as “proof” behind the message.
The Employer Value Proposition (EVP) usually sits at the centre, answering why someone should choose to work here. It is aimed outward, written for the person deciding whether to apply.
It’s not a wrong definition, don’t get me wrong (even if I am not a supporter of EVPs).
It’s just that it’s a rather small definition.
The problem is that it quietly assumes the real audience is external, and that internal culture is the evidence you cite to make the external story credible.
Internal vs. External Employer Branding: The Two-Perspective Rule
Here’s the mechanism behind The Magnetic Employer Branding Method™:
Every Key Story Theme must carry two perspectives at once:
- The company’s reasoning on “why we exist, how we do things here and what success looks like”.
- The employee’s lived experience of it as “how I feel about it and how does this all make my life better”
Practically, this means creating content about your leadership approach to a market shift isn’t written once for LinkedIn (external) and rewritten once for the intranet (internal).
Instead, if it’s relevant messaging for your business and organisation (not everything is), turn it into a series of content for both audiences (internal and external) and write it so that you position talent as the hero and your leadership as their guide.
In this series, each piece of content takes the reader further along the path to learn what the leadership approach is, why it matters to your business, people, and customers, and how it’s meant to make life better for your people and your customers. Additionally, the series should include both employee and individual leader perspectives on how they feel about the approach, along with testimonials on how it has improved their lives.
The Employer Brand is a Sibling, Not a Twin
Think of your company brand and your employer brand as two siblings raised by the same parents.
They share the same values, mission, and purpose, but are distinct individuals because they speak to people asking fundamentally different questions.
A customer asks: Will this deliver value for me (in my role first, then for the company)?
An employee or candidate asks: Will I grow here? Will I belong here? Will being part of this organisation and business make my life better?
Even when the audience overlaps (think a B2B buyer who could also be a future employee), the decision-making shifts completely depending on which hat they’re wearing.
That’s why the employer brand can’t just be the company brand in a friendlier font.
And it’s exactly why it can’t be built for outsiders alone: The same person might ask “will I belong here” as a candidate this year and as an employee next year. Not to mention, “do I still belong here” a few years later!
From Internal vs. External Employer Branding to Internal and External Employer Branding
Why This matters more, not less, right now
Employees talk. Glassdoor exists.
Former colleagues sit on LinkedIn next to active candidates.
An organisation that builds two separate stories, one for outsiders, one for insiders, isn’t protecting anything anymore. It’s just delaying the moment the two stories meet each other in public.
This is one piece of the Master Plan I teach in full in Story-Driven Employer Branding: the book, the method, and the five principles behind it.
If this is the gap you’ve been feeling in your own employer brand work, I’d love to show you what it looks like applied to your organisation.
Get the book · Book a conversation with us
